Point #2 of the 7 Key Points to Understanding the IMPACTS Concept

May 18th, 2010 by Dickey Eason

The hydrogen atom–one proton and one electron. But still it is out of balance. It needs another electron for balance. How will it get it? It will share the valence electron of another atom, becoming a molecule.

So a part of the hydrogen atom is always looking for a way to attain balance. I believe it is the electron that is searching–not the entire atom.

It is the same in human society. The IMPACTS are the valence electron–they are always trying to bring balance to their environment. Therefore they are innovative, persistent, and dedicated.

So the 2nd key point is that IMPACTS behave just like the valence electron.

The 3rd point tomorrow.

7 Key Points to Understanding the IMPACTS Concept–Point #1

May 17th, 2010 by Dickey Eason

Over the next 7 days, I will explain briefly what I believe are the 7 points that are key to understanding the IMPACTS concept. It is all very rational and I think you will see it makes perfect sense–if I explain it correctly. Everything is following a natural progression. The development of the family is the same as the development of the atom is the same as the development of the country and on and on. Everything is following the same model.

Point #1

The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics and its antithesis. The 2nd Law is simple–concentrated energy anywhere in the universe including on earth will disperse (break up and scatter) if not hindered from doing so. Obviously hindering is at work because we are here as are planets and stars and billions of other things. What is holding it together? Strong bonds and strong attractions. Some cosmologists believe it is mainly electrical–most believe it is gravitational, including that caused by dark matter. I think the important point is this–the universe is expanding and dispersing–galaxies are moving apart BUT there is a force that is working hard to keep things together. To me that is the most important part–the dichotomy at work–the dynamic–the battle. I don’t think the universe is just a “picture-show”–I believe it is a struggle between the forces of dispersal (coming apart) and the forces of “keeping together”.

We see these exact same 2 forces on earth. Of course human beings and human societies are a hybrid of these 2 forces–we don’t see the “pure” forms of the forces–we see the hybrid versions. It is the same with the orbit of the moon. Two forces are at work. One is moving the moon straight ahead in a straight line–the other is the force of the earth pulling it straight down. The result is the moon in its orbit.

In the universe I think the male force is the dispersal force and the female force is the “hold together” force. The same 2 forces are at work on earth among human beings. The pure male force breaks up concentrated energy and takes–the pure female force creates, forms, and produces–it fights back against dispersal.

This is the 1st key point–2 forces appear to be struggling across the universe–a male force and a female force, and it is the same 2 forces that struggle on earth. Taoists have been saying this for centuries though not using the exact same terminology though they have called the 2 forces male and female. I agree with the Taoists but I will take it further.

The 2nd point tomorrow.

Oil Spill

May 13th, 2010 by Dickey Eason

The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is a good example of how the world works.

IMPACTS are the ones who discover where the oil is, how to extract it from the earth, how to ship it, how to refine it, and how to make engines that can utilize it. And if given the power, they could find ways to safeguard against disasters like we are currently seeing. But the SN is in charge–the SN captures the IMPACTS energy and uses it for its own ends. Now the IMPACTS will be utilized to clean up everything, as much as is possible. And then the cycle will repeat itself.

This is the way that energy gets organized, and often with catastrophic results. The only way to lead humanity in another direction is to have IMPACTS in the board room,  in the control room, and in the halls of legislatures–in very large numbers–soon.

Mendeleev’s Mother

May 11th, 2010 by Dickey Eason

The IMPACTS profile is mostly a female-oriented profile as was the San tribe. So when considering the IMPACTS profile, think of the attitude a mother would have toward the safety and well-being of her child or children. This is the basic attitude that IMPACTS have toward the world and whatever they are doing.

Some examples of that attitude of the mother and IMPACTS: a sense of urgency, hope for the future, efficient or the attempt to be, immense love and caring, alert for needs, wanting the “best they can be”, innovative in search of solutions, wanting constant improvement, and more.

Let me give you an example of the mother-child relationship that really signifies the IMPACTS profile and attitude.

Dmitri Mendeleev, the Russian who gave the world the Periodic Table of the Elements in 1869, was born in western Siberia in 1834, the last of 14-17 children. The actual total is in dispute. His father was an educator and teacher but early in Dmitri’s childhood, he went blind and later died of tuberculosis when Dmitri was in his early teens.

Dmitri’s mother was from an entrepreneurial family. Her grandfather had started a glass-making business and a newspaper business. Upon the death of her husband, she took over management of the glass factory owned by her brother. Soon it had burned to the ground, putting her, Dmitri, and her daughter in a bad situation. The other children were out on their own.

Maria had been saving for years in the expectation of sending Dmitri to a university, as those around him acknowledged his intellect to be superior. So now faced with few options and at age 57, she took the two children and hitchhiked 4,000 miles from Siberia to Moscow in an effort to enroll Dmitri in a university. Turned down in Moscow, they proceeded another 400 miles on to St Petersburg to the school where her deceased husband had been schooled. A family friend was in charge, Dmitri passed the exams, and he was given a full scholarship. Soon, his mother and sister had died of tuberculosis.

Dmitri said about his mother: “She instructed by example, corrected with love, and in order to devote me to science, left Siberia with me, spending her last resources and strength.”

Dmitri’s mother illustrates vividly the attitude of the IMPACTS, and we see it in the mother-child relationship. This is no surprise because this is the foundation of human life—this is the dispersal-hindering agent—mother and child. This is IMPACTS energy and attitude. IMPACTS generally take this attitude out into the world, IMPACTS men and women alike. The world has to have this attitude or it would not last, just as the mother has to have this attitude or the human race would not last.

Another aspect of the 2nd Law is that energy must be continually re-infused because over time, it loses part of its strength (disperses). The IMPACTS have ample energy and they keep infusing the environment wherever they go.

Let’s keep in mind the IMPACTS traits and characteristics that we see in the Mendeleev family.
Mother’s tenacious love
Strong family bonds
Education emphasis
Travel for opportunities
Recovery from adversity
Entrepreneurial leanings
Coming from the periphery
The effort to actualize potential—use all of that concentrated energy for good
Refusal to accept defeat
Discovery and invention

Mendeleev went on to invent the Periodic Table of Elements. His mother’s love and sacrifice aided all of humanity. That’s why I say that love is the strongest force in the universe.

Why Science is Not Really Science

May 6th, 2010 by Dickey Eason

The SN of society, the power core, writes the rules. It tells us how things work–its version. Naturally it will write the rules in its favor. It will tell the story the way it wants it to be heard.

The SN controls science as well. Real science would look at all the variables in the environment. That is what the San tribe and shaman did over 100,000 yrs ago. They invented the scientific method but then the SN captured it and “wrote new rules for it”.

The San saw a dynamic everywhere–everything was alive. Therefore, everything was treated with reverence. The SN came along with agriculture and said everything is dead–let’s take what we want and use it to grow “bigger and stronger”. It also took the same attitude toward science–science is what we say it is. It did not allow science to see a dynamic anywhere in the universe. If people wanted to see a dynamic, it would be personal–it would be religion.

We don’t see a dynamic operating because the SN and science don’t allow one to exist in the current paradigm. We have battles all over earth but there cannot be battles in the cosmos, according to science. But I beg to differ. I believe the cosmos has its own battles and they are just like those on earth–they are male and female forces essentially. One is pulling or pushing apart–the other is trying to bring together.

The paradigm is set up to benefit those in control of it. We need a new one–one that encompasses all of the variables, not just the ones the SN favors. If you start bringing in all of the variables, then you might see what is really going on among human beings–and you would see that what we now have is “written”–not researched without boundaries, which is the true mark of a REAL scientist.

Male vs Female

April 26th, 2010 by Dickey Eason

After years of research and thousands of pages read and written, I have come to the final conclusion as to why the world is experiencing so many problems–male energy vs female energy is out of balance. For a better future, more of a balance must be attained.

You might say–”I could have told you that!”

Before I even started on all of this, I would have said the same thing. But now I have the “proof” though that is not what I was looking for. I was trying to figure out as much as possible about how the world and universe really work. What I discovered is that there is a male force that, if not controlled, will take and take and take. And there is a female force that is generally peaceful and which continually creates and produces “good stuff”. Children are a good example though there are many more of course.

Some males have ample amounts of the female force and some females have significant amounts of the male force. These are usually the IMPACTS people that I write about. They usually have the balance that the rest of mankind needs in order to be more peaceful.

But the pure male force is a power-control force, and it is very difficult to crack those walls. Look around the world–female energy is largely absent from the violent areas. Pure male energy is in control and it is easy to identify.

All of this follows the rest of the universe precisely. There are no deviations. That is why you can look at the hydrogen atom and see the universe. It is the same all the way through–including with human beings and what some call “civilization”. Energy behaves the same wherever it is–and there appear to be two major forms of it–male energy and female energy–throughout the universe.

SIMPLE.

What the Bleep

April 25th, 2010 by Dickey Eason

I just viewed “What the Bleep Do We Know?” for the first time. In my opinion, it misses the boat. Everything is focusing on the ME–what can I do to change MY reality? To me the question should really be–What can I do to change the reality for ALL?

Focusing so much on the ME is exactly what the SN wants you to do. That is how it maintains its power and control–by diverting (or dispersing) the attention of individuals from the well-being of the whole. That is one reason we have the mess we do–our energies are being chopped up into little pieces.

The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics explains everything. Our separateness from one another has little to do with what is inside our own head and much more to do with the way society–and indeed–the universe is set up. It is a dispersal-oriented universe (2nd Law) and it takes effort to hold it together, and that includes human society. The answer to less separateness and more community is to equalize the 2 major forces in human society. And those just happen to be the male force and the female force.

Out-of-Africa

April 23rd, 2010 by Dickey Eason

We all know that there was an out-of-Africa group or groups. From all of my research, the clear deduction is that it could only have been one group and that was the San tribe. I have never read where any anthropologist has come to that conclusion. Honestly, it is one of the easiest things I have ever deduced. That it is not common knowledge and in every anthropology textbook can be true for only one reason–it must not serve the interests of the SN or powers-that-be.

If every person on earth knew that the San were the group that colonized the world, human thinking could shift into more of a communal philosophy, and that would go against SN concerns.

What else is totally obvious that we are missing, and is it as important as the knowledge that the San were the out-of-Africa group?

Why Mainstream Science Won’t See This

April 20th, 2010 by Dickey Eason

Traditional science is linear–it does not see a dynamic at work. Taoists saw a dynamic existing between a male force and a female force in the universe–and they saw it centuries ago. But science does not.

Why not? Because if science saw a dynamic operating in the universe, it would quickly see a dynamic operating among human beings–and this would make things very messy.

To early humans like the San, everything was alive with spirits. It was a dynamic world and universe. But in our world, dynamism is only allowed in bits and pieces–such as, she is a dynamic person, or he is a dynamic speaker.

This inability to see the dynamic operating across the universe completely skews and distorts how human beings see the world and the universe–and maintains the worst parts of our status quo. It also makes science a poor choice when looking for the “truth”. Science has become the ally of the SN or structural nucleus of society and not of those who are actually providing the creative-productive energy–those who tend to be searching for the real secrets of the universe.

Mistakes

April 18th, 2010 by Dickey Eason

One reason we make so many mistakes in life is because we do not understand what is going on in the world, and that includes our personal world. We fumble in the dark from the beginning because everyone else is fumbling in the dark.

That is one of the reasons that I pursue the truth so doggedly–I am very tired of getting bad information from every direction, and I am tired of incorrect answers and half-hearted attempts to find answers. Plus I hate the lies we generally get from the media and politicians, giving us their version of reality which most of us recognize is deeply distorted.

I look for the unvarnished truth because I believe that the truth is our ally. That’s what I have tried to do with all of my research–find the truth of how everything really works, including humanity. I think what I have found will be very useful to you too if you also believe that truth is our ally. It won’t stop you from making mistakes but I think it will help you better manage your life as you navigate the world–and give you a clearer picture of what is really happening and why it is happening. The “why” is extremely important.