The IMPACTS Blog

I have said many times before that I believe that the universe is a male-female struggle. The male force is the “take” force and the female is the “create-produce” force. The male force is stronger–that’s why we have the world we do.

Prior to agriculture, it appears that it was mostly a peaceful world. Agriculture enabled male energy to capture female energy, using it for fuel. At its base, that’s what the universe is–a machine and fuel. The same applies to us. Male energy is the machine and female energy is the fuel.

Politics and countries are machines–they have to have fuel in order to quench their male thirst. That thirst will vary according to the nature of the male energy. Sweden’s thirst is different from Israel’s thirst. Male energy exists on a continuum just as does everything else, including female energy–and IMPACTS energy.

The IMPACTS are the fuel for the male machine–everywhere around the world. Male energy has to have it or it cannot survive. You can see this clearly with the example of a family. If the male can’t find a female to mate with, there is no family–no machine. This characterizes the dynamic operating across the universe–the male machine has to have female energy in order to exist, and to continue to survive.

Politics is mostly a male machine, especially at the higher levels. That’s why it is full of machinations and deal-making. It is a game, a game of power. Politics came in with agriculture too. That’s one reason IMPACTS are not usually involved at the higher levels except in supportive roles–IMPACTS are from another time, the time of the San tribe from over 100,000 years ago.

Females are rarely capable of the violence we see among men on such a grand scale. Their energy is usually used to overcome the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, which continually pushes everything apart. Male energy can be seen as an ally of the 2nd Law, hastening the unraveling of “concentrated energy”.

What if a theory came along that solved most of the mysteries that have baffled astronomers, anthropologists, sociologists, historians, and many other disciplines–and it was the same theory for all of them? Would people want to know or would they brush it aside?

If you were taking a trip in the car and the bridge 200 miles ahead was out, would you want to know? Of course–so you could make other plans. But most of us do not want the same in life itself because we have too much invested in our current view. That is totally understandable. It takes a very nimble personality to be ready for any change in the environment.

When Einstein came out with his theories, 99% of people did not want to know. A huge percentage still have no interest in them. But still they changed the world in a very dramatic way. The IMPACTS concept can do the same though only a tiny percentage of people will really be interested. As Margaret Mead said, “The world has always been changed by a committed few–and always will be.”